- Регистрация
- 17 Февраль 2018
- Сообщения
- 38 911
- Лучшие ответы
- 0
- Реакции
- 0
- Баллы
- 2 093
Offline
If you're constantly fooled by AI-generated images, you aren't alone. Turns out, most people are.
Image: Midjourney
According to a new research paper by Microsoft’s AI for Good Lab, humans are surprisingly (or maybe not-so-surprisingly) bad at detecting and recognizing AI-generated images.
The study collected data from an online “Real or Not Quiz” game, involving over 12,500 global participants who analyzed approximately 287,000 total images (a randomized mixture of real and AI-generated) to determine which ones were real and which ones were fake.
The results showed that participants had an overall success rate around 62 percent—only slightly better than flipping a coin. The study also showed that it’s easier to identify fake images of faces than landscapes, but even then the difference is only by a few percent.
In light of this study, Microsoft is advocating for clearer labeling of AI-generated images, but critics point out that it’s easy to get around this by cropping the images in question.
This article originally appeared on our sister publication PC för Alla and was translated and localized from Swedish.
Author: Mikael Markander, Contributor, PCWorld
Mikael writes news across all our consumer tech categories. He has previously worked with Macworld, but today mainly writes for our sister sites PC för Alla and M3. Mikael has a firm grasp on which gadgets are released, and what is happening with the streaming services and the latest AI tools.
Recent stories by Mikael Markander:
Image: Midjourney
According to a new research paper by Microsoft’s AI for Good Lab, humans are surprisingly (or maybe not-so-surprisingly) bad at detecting and recognizing AI-generated images.
The study collected data from an online “Real or Not Quiz” game, involving over 12,500 global participants who analyzed approximately 287,000 total images (a randomized mixture of real and AI-generated) to determine which ones were real and which ones were fake.
The results showed that participants had an overall success rate around 62 percent—only slightly better than flipping a coin. The study also showed that it’s easier to identify fake images of faces than landscapes, but even then the difference is only by a few percent.
In light of this study, Microsoft is advocating for clearer labeling of AI-generated images, but critics point out that it’s easy to get around this by cropping the images in question.
This article originally appeared on our sister publication PC för Alla and was translated and localized from Swedish.
Author: Mikael Markander, Contributor, PCWorld
Mikael writes news across all our consumer tech categories. He has previously worked with Macworld, but today mainly writes for our sister sites PC för Alla and M3. Mikael has a firm grasp on which gadgets are released, and what is happening with the streaming services and the latest AI tools.
Recent stories by Mikael Markander:
